The highest 4 CPUs on the W-2200 SKU record are, successfully, Cascade Lake-X plus ECC RAM and AMT out-of-band administration.
To utterly no one’s shock, Xeon W-2200 additionally has DLB directions accessible. This is identical instruction set extension accessible in Cascade Lake-X, Ice Lake, and newer Xeon Scalable CPUs.
The 2 issues you actually need to learn about this slide: “earlier era” means Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon W-2195, and “three years in the past” means Xeon W-2295 vs Xeon E5-1680v4.
That is the gathering of high-quality print footnotes for the efficiency slides within the deck. An important information is what “vs final era” and “vs three-year-old workstation” imply respectively.
At present, Intel’s W-2200 sequence Xeon joins Cascade Lake-X within the 2019 HEDT lineup. The Xeon W line goes additional down into low-performance territory than Cascade Lake-X does, however the top-four CPUs within the lineup successfully are Cascade Lake-X: they have the identical core and thread rely, identical base and turbo frequencies, identical quantity of cache, identical variety of CPU lanes, and the identical marketed TDP, together with help for Deep Studying Increase, Thunderbolt three, 2.5G Ethernet, and Wi-Fi 6.
Except for Cascade Lake-X being unlocked for overclocking, the largest—and as far as we will inform, solely—actual differentiator between Cascade Lake-X and the highest 4 Xeon-W2200 processors is Intel vPro platform help. The vPro label signifies that Xeon-W2200 CPUs help as much as 1TB of ECC RAM (in comparison with Cascade Lake-X’s 256GB of non-ECC) and Intel Energetic Administration Know-how (an out-of-band administration system that runs on the Intel Administration Engine, not the primary x86-context CPU).
Xeon W-2200 CPU specs. Word that the highest 4 SKUs are primarily an identical to Cascade Lake-X—however with ECC and AMT tacked on.
The underside 4 do not neatly correspond to any present CPU fashions from one other Intel household.
These are the specs for the latest crop of X-series CPUs—which Intel says we should not name “10th era,” regardless of the mannequin numbers.
For comparability, these Ninth-generation Core F and KF processors—launched in Q1 and Q2—have fewer PCIe lanes, much less cache, and fewer reminiscence channels than Core X or Xeon W.
The opposite differentiator between Cascade Lake X sequence and Xeon W-2200 is, after all, worth. Like Cascade Lake-X, Xeon W-2200 lower Xeon W-2100’s costs roughly in half—Xeon W-2295 prices $1,333 in comparison with Xeon W-2195’s $2,553, for instance. This nonetheless leaves you with a couple of 25% worth enhance going from a Cascade Lake-X CPU to its equal within the Xeon W-2200 line.
The cheaper half of the Xeon W-2200 line—together with the $667 8C/16T Xeon W-2245—are quite odd geese. They do not actually evaluate on to every other Intel CPUs and are finest fitted to calmly threaded functions that want loads of RAM. In the event you do not want the 1TB of addressable RAM or Intel’s out-of-band Energetic Administration, you may get a sooner CPU for the cash in both Intel’s $440 8C/16T i9-9900 or AMD’s $330 8C/16T Ryzen 7 3700X—and in case your app scales properly throughout numerous threads, you are seemingly higher off with AMD’s $675 16C/32T Epyc 7282—or no matter comes out in November to switch final 12 months’s $640 16C/32T Threadripper 2950X.
In the event you’re available in the market to improve an getting older Intel HEDT workstation, the value cuts make this a reasonably first rate time to do it. Though there’s not a lot to take a look at when it comes to year-on-year efficiency from 2018—a couple of 10% enhance in efficiency throughout the board—you’ll be able to nearly double the efficiency of a three-year-old Xeon e5.
The true query raised is whether or not it makes extra sense to re-up with Intel in your HEDT desktop, or swap to AMD. It is troublesome to successfully reply that query earlier than we study the ultimate particulars on this 12 months’s Threadripper CPUs, due out in November—however our guess is, workforce AMD might be going to be trying higher for many workloads.
Intel forces you to decide on between enormous banks of ECC RAM on Xeon W or overclocking help on Core X. Threadripper brings each to the desk in a single CPU, providing each 2TB addressable ECC RAM and Precision Increase Overdrive overclocking. Intel will seemingly proceed to have a small benefit on single or dual-threaded workloads, however we count on that benefit to have shrunk dramatically this 12 months in Core X/Xeon W vs Threadripper three, simply because it did with Core i5/i7/i9 vs Ryzen 3000.
The one actual remaining questions are in worth—and extra importantly, large OEM vendor buy-in. Most individuals aren’t shopping for Xeon W CPUs from small system builders; they’re shopping for them in pre-built Dell, HP, and Lenovo workstations. We all know AMD already has not less than some traction with HP because of the information concerning the EliteDesk 705 G5 line. If it may possibly rating related offers with large OEMs within the workstation/HEDT market, there is a potential for actual upset to Intel’s long-standing near-monopoly in that house.
Itemizing picture by Intel Company